Head to head
Tokyo Ghoul vs Umi no Uta
Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.
The short version
- Tokyo Ghoul is more widely watched, with 6294× the members.
- Umi no Uta is the quicker watch, 4h 18m shorter.
- Fans favorite Tokyo Ghoul more often (2.3% vs 0.0% of members).
- They share Psychological.
| Tokyo Ghoul | Umi no Uta | |
|---|---|---|
| Community score | 8.01 | – |
| Rank by score | #819 | – |
| Members | 176,222more | 28 |
| Favorited by | 2.3%more | 0.0% |
| Time to watch | 4h 48m | 30mshorter |
| Episodes | 12 | 1 |
| Format | TV Series | Movie |
| Aired | 2014 | 1988 |
| Status | Finished | Finished |
| Studio | Studio Pierrot | – |
| Age rating | R | – |
Time to watch
Episodes × episode length, openings included
Show as table
| Item | Runtime |
|---|---|
| Tokyo Ghoul | 4h 48m |
| Umi no Uta | 30m |
Shared genres
Only Umi no Uta
More comparisons
Tokyo Ghoul vs Umi no Uta FAQ
Is Tokyo Ghoul better than Umi no Uta?
Not enough ratings yet to compare scores.
Which is longer, Tokyo Ghoul or Umi no Uta?
Tokyo Ghoul is longer: 4h 48m against 30m.
Which is more popular?
Tokyo Ghoul has more members on Kitsu (176,222 vs 28).
If I liked Tokyo Ghoul, will I like Umi no Uta?
Probably, if it was the psychological side you enjoyed.