AniLumi home

Head to head

Pocket Monsters vs Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko

Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.

The short version

  • Pocket Monsters is rated higher by the community: 7.29 vs 6.55.
  • Pocket Monsters is more widely watched, with 354× the members.
  • Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko is the quicker watch, 4d 14h shorter.
  • Fans favorite Pocket Monsters more often (1.0% vs 0.0% of members).
  • They have no main genre in common, so they suit different moods.
Pocket MonstersTomato ni Natta Otokonoko
Community score7.29higher6.55
Rank by score#3,664better#8,952
Members41,807more118
Favorited by1.0%more0.0%
Time to watch4d 14h4mshorter
Episodes2761
FormatTV SeriesONA
Aired1997–20022015
StatusFinishedFinished
Studio––
Age ratingPGG

How each is rated

Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 25% vs 7%

  • Pocket Monsters
  • Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko
0%15%30%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
Pocket MonstersTomato ni Natta Otokonoko
1★1%0%
2★1%7%
3★1%15%
4★4%5%
5★8%28%
6★16%11%
7★27%25%
8★17%3%
9★9%0%
10★16%7%

Time to watch

Episodes × episode length, openings included

Show as table
ItemRuntime
Pocket Monsters4d 14h
Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko4m

Only Pocket Monsters

Shared genres

None

Only Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko

More comparisons

Pocket Monsters vs Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko FAQ

Is Pocket Monsters better than Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko?

By community score, Pocket Monsters is ahead (7.29 vs 6.55). They are quite different shows, so the better pick depends on what you're in the mood for.

Which is longer, Pocket Monsters or Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko?

Pocket Monsters is longer: 4d 14h against 4m.

Which is more popular?

Pocket Monsters has more members on Kitsu (41,807 vs 118).

If I liked Pocket Monsters, will I like Tomato ni Natta Otokonoko?

Not necessarily: they don't share a main genre. Try the “anime like Pocket Monsters” list instead.