Head to head
Naruto vs Fusha no Sha
Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.
The short version
- Naruto is rated higher by the community: 8.02 vs 6.87.
- Naruto is more widely watched, with 737× the members.
- Fusha no Sha is the quicker watch, 3d 11h shorter.
- Fans favorite Naruto more often (2.8% vs 0.4% of members).
- They share Adventure, Martial Arts.
| Naruto | Fusha no Sha | |
|---|---|---|
| Community score | 8.02higher | 6.87 |
| Rank by score | #803better | #6,528 |
| Members | 165,767more | 225 |
| Favorited by | 2.8%more | 0.4% |
| Time to watch | 3d 12h | 25mshorter |
| Episodes | 220 | 1 |
| Format | TV Series | Movie |
| Aired | 2002–2007 | 1988 |
| Status | Finished | Finished |
| Studio | Studio Pierrot | – |
| Age rating | PG | PG |
How each is rated
Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 44% vs 10%
- Naruto
- Fusha no Sha
0%20%40%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
| Naruto | Fusha no Sha | |
|---|---|---|
| 1★ | 1% | 4% |
| 2★ | 1% | 2% |
| 3★ | 1% | 3% |
| 4★ | 3% | 5% |
| 5★ | 3% | 8% |
| 6★ | 8% | 23% |
| 7★ | 22% | 32% |
| 8★ | 17% | 14% |
| 9★ | 12% | 3% |
| 10★ | 32% | 7% |
Time to watch
Episodes × episode length, openings included
Show as table
| Item | Runtime |
|---|---|
| Naruto | 3d 12h |
| Fusha no Sha | 25m |
Only Naruto
Shared genres
Only Fusha no Sha
More comparisons
Naruto vs Fusha no Sha FAQ
Is Naruto better than Fusha no Sha?
By community score, Naruto is ahead (8.02 vs 6.87). Both are adventure and martial arts, so taste decides the rest.
Which is longer, Naruto or Fusha no Sha?
Naruto is longer: 3d 12h against 25m.
Which is more popular?
Naruto has more members on Kitsu (165,767 vs 225).
If I liked Naruto, will I like Fusha no Sha?
Probably, if it was the adventure, martial arts side you enjoyed.