AniLumiAniLumi home

Head to head

Naruto vs Pucca (2006)

Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.

The short version

  • Naruto is rated higher by the community: 8.02 vs 6.60.
  • Naruto is more widely watched, with 147× the members.
  • Pucca (2006) is the quicker watch, 3d 2h shorter.
  • Fans favorite Naruto more often (2.8% vs 0.1% of members).
  • They share Comedy.
NarutoPucca (2006)
Community score8.02higher6.60
Rank by score#802better#8,580
Members165,711more1,129
Favorited by2.8%more0.1%
Time to watch3d 12h9h 58mshorter
Episodes22026
FormatTV SeriesTV Series
Aired2002–20072006–2007
StatusFinishedFinished
StudioStudio Pierrot–
Age ratingPGG

How each is rated

Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 44% vs 16%

  • Naruto
  • Pucca (2006)
0%20%40%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
NarutoPucca (2006)
1★1%2%
2★1%2%
3★1%5%
4★3%8%
5★3%14%
6★8%17%
7★22%23%
8★17%11%
9★12%3%
10★32%13%

Time to watch

Episodes × episode length, openings included

Show as table
ItemRuntime
Naruto3d 12h
Pucca (2006)9h 58m

Shared genres

Only Pucca (2006)

More comparisons

Naruto vs Pucca (2006) FAQ

Is Naruto better than Pucca (2006)?

By community score, Naruto is ahead (8.02 vs 6.60). Both are comedy, so taste decides the rest.

Which is longer, Naruto or Pucca (2006)?

Naruto is longer: 3d 12h against 9h 58m.

Which is more popular?

Naruto has more members on Kitsu (165,711 vs 1,129).

If I liked Naruto, will I like Pucca (2006)?

Probably, if it was the comedy side you enjoyed.