Head to head
Kimi no Na wa. vs Nanami-chan
Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.
The short version
- Kimi no Na wa. is rated higher by the community: 8.33 vs 6.49.
- Kimi no Na wa. is more widely watched, with 2337× the members.
- Nanami-chan is the quicker watch, 46m shorter.
- Fans favorite Kimi no Na wa. more often (1.0% vs 0.0% of members).
- They have no main genre in common, so they suit different moods.
| Kimi no Na wa. | Nanami-chan | |
|---|---|---|
| Community score | 8.33higher | 6.49 |
| Rank by score | #90better | #9,401 |
| Members | 420,661more | 180 |
| Favorited by | 1.0%more | 0.0% |
| Time to watch | 1h 46m | 1hshorter |
| Episodes | 1 | 12 |
| Format | Movie | TV Series |
| Aired | 2016 | 2004–2005 |
| Status | Finished | Finished |
| Studio | CoMix Wave Films | – |
| Age rating | PG | G |
How each is rated
Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 64% vs 4%
- Kimi no Na wa.
- Nanami-chan
0%30%60%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
| Kimi no Na wa. | Nanami-chan | |
|---|---|---|
| 1★ | 4% | 2% |
| 2★ | 0% | 0% |
| 3★ | 0% | 5% |
| 4★ | 7% | 20% |
| 5★ | 1% | 20% |
| 6★ | 1% | 22% |
| 7★ | 16% | 20% |
| 8★ | 5% | 9% |
| 9★ | 8% | 0% |
| 10★ | 56% | 4% |
Time to watch
Episodes × episode length, openings included
Show as table
| Item | Runtime |
|---|---|
| Kimi no Na wa. | 1h 46m |
| Nanami-chan | 1h |
Only Kimi no Na wa.
Shared genres
None
Only Nanami-chan
More comparisons
Kimi no Na wa. vs Nanami-chan FAQ
Is Kimi no Na wa. better than Nanami-chan?
By community score, Kimi no Na wa. is ahead (8.33 vs 6.49). They are quite different shows, so the better pick depends on what you're in the mood for.
Which is longer, Kimi no Na wa. or Nanami-chan?
Kimi no Na wa. is longer: 1h 46m against 1h.
Which is more popular?
Kimi no Na wa. has more members on Kitsu (420,661 vs 180).
If I liked Kimi no Na wa., will I like Nanami-chan?
Not necessarily: they don't share a main genre. Try the “anime like Kimi no Na wa.” list instead.