Head to head
Kimi no Na wa. vs Mitsu x Mitsu Drops
Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.
The short version
- Kimi no Na wa. is rated higher by the community: 8.33 vs 5.64.
- Kimi no Na wa. is more widely watched, with 217× the members.
- Mitsu x Mitsu Drops is the quicker watch, 52m shorter.
- Fans favorite Kimi no Na wa. more often (1.0% vs 0.4% of members).
- They share Romance, School Life.
| Kimi no Na wa. | Mitsu x Mitsu Drops | |
|---|---|---|
| Community score | 8.33higher | 5.64 |
| Rank by score | #90better | #12,648 |
| Members | 420,933more | 1,939 |
| Favorited by | 1.0%more | 0.4% |
| Time to watch | 1h 46m | 54mshorter |
| Episodes | 1 | 2 |
| Format | Movie | OVA |
| Aired | 2016 | 2006 |
| Status | Finished | Finished |
| Studio | CoMix Wave Films | – |
| Age rating | PG | PG |
How each is rated
Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 64% vs 13%
- Kimi no Na wa.
- Mitsu x Mitsu Drops
0%30%60%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
| Kimi no Na wa. | Mitsu x Mitsu Drops | |
|---|---|---|
| 1★ | 4% | 9% |
| 2★ | 0% | 8% |
| 3★ | 0% | 7% |
| 4★ | 7% | 14% |
| 5★ | 1% | 13% |
| 6★ | 1% | 13% |
| 7★ | 17% | 17% |
| 8★ | 5% | 7% |
| 9★ | 8% | 4% |
| 10★ | 56% | 9% |
Time to watch
Episodes × episode length, openings included
Show as table
| Item | Runtime |
|---|---|
| Kimi no Na wa. | 1h 46m |
| Mitsu x Mitsu Drops | 54m |
Only Kimi no Na wa.
Shared genres
Only Mitsu x Mitsu Drops
More comparisons
Kimi no Na wa. vs Mitsu x Mitsu Drops FAQ
Is Kimi no Na wa. better than Mitsu x Mitsu Drops?
By community score, Kimi no Na wa. is ahead (8.33 vs 5.64). Both are romance and school life, so taste decides the rest.
Which is longer, Kimi no Na wa. or Mitsu x Mitsu Drops?
Kimi no Na wa. is longer: 1h 46m against 54m.
Which is more popular?
Kimi no Na wa. has more members on Kitsu (420,933 vs 1,939).
If I liked Kimi no Na wa., will I like Mitsu x Mitsu Drops?
Probably, if it was the romance, school life side you enjoyed.

