Head to head
Flame of Recca vs Haikyuu!!
Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.
The short version
- Haikyuu!! is rated higher by the community: 8.29 vs 7.14.
- Haikyuu!! is more widely watched, with 45× the members.
- Haikyuu!! is the quicker watch, 6h 6m shorter.
- Fans favorite Haikyuu!! more often (1.5% vs 0.5% of members).
- They have no main genre in common, so they suit different moods.
| Flame of Recca | Haikyuu!! | |
|---|---|---|
| Community score | 7.14 | 8.29higher |
| Rank by score | #4,622 | #116better |
| Members | 5,875 | 263,806more |
| Favorited by | 0.5% | 1.5%more |
| Time to watch | 16h 6m | 10hshorter |
| Episodes | 42 | 25 |
| Format | TV Series | TV Series |
| Aired | 1997–1998 | 2014 |
| Status | Finished | Finished |
| Studio | Studio Pierrot | Production I.G, Production I.G |
| Age rating | PG | PG |
How each is rated
Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 18% vs 62%
- Flame of Recca
- Haikyuu!!
0%30%60%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
| Flame of Recca | Haikyuu!! | |
|---|---|---|
| 1★ | 1% | 5% |
| 2★ | 1% | 0% |
| 3★ | 1% | 0% |
| 4★ | 6% | 6% |
| 5★ | 7% | 1% |
| 6★ | 16% | 2% |
| 7★ | 30% | 15% |
| 8★ | 20% | 9% |
| 9★ | 8% | 9% |
| 10★ | 10% | 53% |
Time to watch
Episodes × episode length, openings included
Show as table
| Item | Runtime |
|---|---|
| Flame of Recca | 16h 6m |
| Haikyuu!! | 10h |
Only Flame of Recca
Shared genres
None
Only Haikyuu!!
More comparisons
Flame of Recca vs Haikyuu!! FAQ
Is Flame of Recca better than Haikyuu!!?
By community score, Haikyuu!! is ahead (8.29 vs 7.14). They are quite different shows, so the better pick depends on what you're in the mood for.
Which is longer, Flame of Recca or Haikyuu!!?
Flame of Recca is longer: 16h 6m against 10h.
Which is more popular?
Haikyuu!! has more members on Kitsu (263,806 vs 5,875).
If I liked Flame of Recca, will I like Haikyuu!!?
Not necessarily: they don't share a main genre. Try the “anime like Flame of Recca” list instead.