Head to head
D.C.if: Da Capo if vs Haikyuu!!
Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.
The short version
- Haikyuu!! is rated higher by the community: 8.29 vs 7.17.
- Haikyuu!! is more widely watched, with 165× the members.
- D.C.if: Da Capo if is the quicker watch, 9h 8m shorter.
- Fans favorite Haikyuu!! more often (1.5% vs 0.2% of members).
- They have no main genre in common, so they suit different moods.
| D.C.if: Da Capo if | Haikyuu!! | |
|---|---|---|
| Community score | 7.17 | 8.29higher |
| Rank by score | #4,432 | #116better |
| Members | 1,598 | 263,624more |
| Favorited by | 0.2% | 1.5%more |
| Time to watch | 52mshorter | 10h |
| Episodes | 2 | 25 |
| Format | OVA | TV Series |
| Aired | 2008–2009 | 2014 |
| Status | Finished | Finished |
| Studio | Zexcs | Production I.G, Production I.G |
| Age rating | PG | PG |
How each is rated
Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 18% vs 62%
- D.C.if: Da Capo if
- Haikyuu!!
0%30%60%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
| D.C.if: Da Capo if | Haikyuu!! | |
|---|---|---|
| 1★ | 0% | 5% |
| 2★ | 1% | 0% |
| 3★ | 3% | 0% |
| 4★ | 4% | 6% |
| 5★ | 8% | 1% |
| 6★ | 15% | 2% |
| 7★ | 27% | 15% |
| 8★ | 24% | 9% |
| 9★ | 7% | 9% |
| 10★ | 11% | 53% |
Time to watch
Episodes × episode length, openings included
Show as table
| Item | Runtime |
|---|---|
| D.C.if: Da Capo if | 52m |
| Haikyuu!! | 10h |
Shared genres
None
Only Haikyuu!!
More comparisons
D.C.if: Da Capo if vs Haikyuu!! FAQ
Is D.C.if: Da Capo if better than Haikyuu!!?
By community score, Haikyuu!! is ahead (8.29 vs 7.17). They are quite different shows, so the better pick depends on what you're in the mood for.
Which is longer, D.C.if: Da Capo if or Haikyuu!!?
Haikyuu!! is longer: 10h against 52m.
Which is more popular?
Haikyuu!! has more members on Kitsu (263,624 vs 1,598).
If I liked D.C.if: Da Capo if, will I like Haikyuu!!?
Not necessarily: they don't share a main genre. Try the “anime like D.C.if: Da Capo if” list instead.

