Head to head
Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi vs Teen Titans
Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.

Left in charts
Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi
Unrated · 1974

Right in charts
Teen Titans
★ 8.21 · 2003–2006
The short version
- Teen Titans is more widely watched, with 482× the members.
- Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi is the quicker watch, 22h 26m shorter.
- They have no main genre in common, so they suit different moods.
| Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi | Teen Titans | |
|---|---|---|
| Community score | – | 8.21 |
| Rank by score | – | #274 |
| Members | 65 | 31,311more |
| Favorited by | 0.0% | 0.5%more |
| Time to watch | 19mshorter | 22h 45m |
| Episodes | 1 | 65 |
| Format | Movie | TV Series |
| Aired | 1974 | 2003–2006 |
| Status | Finished | Finished |
| Studio | – | – |
| Age rating | G | G |
How each is rated
Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 4% vs 61%
- Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi
- Teen Titans
0%30%60%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
| Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi | Teen Titans | |
|---|---|---|
| 1★ | 8% | 6% |
| 2★ | 4% | 1% |
| 3★ | 12% | 0% |
| 4★ | 8% | 5% |
| 5★ | 8% | 1% |
| 6★ | 15% | 3% |
| 7★ | 42% | 17% |
| 8★ | 0% | 6% |
| 9★ | 0% | 5% |
| 10★ | 4% | 56% |
Time to watch
Episodes × episode length, openings included
Show as table
| Item | Runtime |
|---|---|
| Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi | 19m |
| Teen Titans | 22h 45m |
Only Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi
Shared genres
None
Only Teen Titans
More comparisons
Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi vs Teen Titans FAQ
Is Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi better than Teen Titans?
Not enough ratings yet to compare scores.
Which is longer, Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi or Teen Titans?
Teen Titans is longer: 22h 45m against 19m.
Which is more popular?
Teen Titans has more members on Kitsu (31,311 vs 65).
If I liked Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi, will I like Teen Titans?
Not necessarily: they don't share a main genre. Try the “anime like Chiisana Itsutsu no Ohanashi” list instead.