AniLumiAniLumi home

Head to head

Chi's Sweet Home vs Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso

Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.

The short version

  • Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso is rated higher by the community: 8.23 vs 7.65.
  • Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso is more widely watched, with 40× the members.
  • Chi's Sweet Home is the quicker watch, 3h 11m shorter.
  • Fans favorite Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso more often (1.7% vs 0.6% of members).
  • They have no main genre in common, so they suit different moods.
Chi's Sweet HomeShigatsu wa Kimi no Uso
Community score7.658.23higher
Rank by score#1,880#194better
Members5,895233,968more
Favorited by0.6%1.7%more
Time to watch5h 12mshorter8h 23m
Episodes10422
FormatTV SeriesTV Series
Aired20082014–2015
StatusFinishedFinished
StudioMadhouse–
Age ratingGPG

How each is rated

Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 31% vs 61%

  • Chi's Sweet Home
  • Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso
0%30%60%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
Chi's Sweet HomeShigatsu wa Kimi no Uso
1★0%4%
2★1%0%
3★1%0%
4★3%6%
5★5%1%
6★12%2%
7★24%15%
8★24%9%
9★13%12%
10★17%49%

Time to watch

Episodes × episode length, openings included

Show as table
ItemRuntime
Chi's Sweet Home5h 12m
Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso8h 23m

Only Chi's Sweet Home

Shared genres

None

Only Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso

More comparisons

Chi's Sweet Home vs Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso FAQ

Is Chi's Sweet Home better than Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso?

By community score, Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso is ahead (8.23 vs 7.65). They are quite different shows, so the better pick depends on what you're in the mood for.

Which is longer, Chi's Sweet Home or Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso?

Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso is longer: 8h 23m against 5h 12m.

Which is more popular?

Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso has more members on Kitsu (233,968 vs 5,895).

If I liked Chi's Sweet Home, will I like Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso?

Not necessarily: they don't share a main genre. Try the “anime like Chi's Sweet Home” list instead.