Head to head
Btooom! vs Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968)
Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.
The short version
- Btooom! is rated higher by the community: 7.30 vs 6.40.
- Btooom! is more widely watched, with 578× the members.
- Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968) is the quicker watch, 4h 35m shorter.
- Fans favorite Btooom! more often (0.7% vs 0.0% of members).
- They have no main genre in common, so they suit different moods.
| Btooom! | Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968) | |
|---|---|---|
| Community score | 7.30higher | 6.40 |
| Rank by score | #3,593better | #10,027 |
| Members | 58,949more | 102 |
| Favorited by | 0.7%more | 0.0% |
| Time to watch | 4h 48m | 13mshorter |
| Episodes | 12 | 1 |
| Format | TV Series | Movie |
| Aired | 2012 | 1968 |
| Status | Finished | Finished |
| Studio | – | – |
| Age rating | R | G |
How each is rated
Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 23% vs 5%
- Btooom!
- Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968)
0%15%30%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
| Btooom! | Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1★ | 1% | 9% |
| 2★ | 1% | 4% |
| 3★ | 2% | 7% |
| 4★ | 5% | 13% |
| 5★ | 6% | 25% |
| 6★ | 13% | 15% |
| 7★ | 26% | 22% |
| 8★ | 24% | 0% |
| 9★ | 11% | 4% |
| 10★ | 12% | 2% |
Time to watch
Episodes × episode length, openings included
Show as table
| Item | Runtime |
|---|---|
| Btooom! | 4h 48m |
| Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968) | 13m |
Only Btooom!
Shared genres
None
Only Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968)
More comparisons
Btooom! vs Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968) FAQ
Is Btooom! better than Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968)?
By community score, Btooom! is ahead (7.30 vs 6.40). They are quite different shows, so the better pick depends on what you're in the mood for.
Which is longer, Btooom! or Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968)?
Btooom! is longer: 4h 48m against 13m.
Which is more popular?
Btooom! has more members on Kitsu (58,949 vs 102).
If I liked Btooom!, will I like Ni-hiki no Sanma (1968)?
Not necessarily: they don't share a main genre. Try the “anime like Btooom!” list instead.