AniLumiAniLumi home

Head to head

Attack on Titan vs Hungry Heart: Wild Striker

Side by side on community score, how it's rated, audience size and how long each takes to watch. Data from Kitsu, refreshed daily.

The short version

  • Attack on Titan is rated higher by the community: 8.44 vs 7.47.
  • Attack on Titan is more widely watched, with 235× the members.
  • Hungry Heart: Wild Striker is the quicker watch, 9h 37m shorter.
  • Fans favorite Attack on Titan more often (1.6% vs 0.6% of members).
  • They share Action.
Attack on TitanHungry Heart: Wild Striker
Community score8.44higher7.47
Rank by score#50better#2,638
Members618,414more2,635
Favorited by1.6%more0.6%
Time to watch10h23mshorter
Episodes2552
FormatTV SeriesTV Series
Aired20132002–2003
StatusFinishedFinished
StudioWit StudioNippon Animation
Age ratingRPG

How each is rated

Share of ratings at each star level · 9★–10★: 63% vs 23%

  • Attack on Titan
  • Hungry Heart: Wild Striker
0%30%60%
1★2★3★4★5★6★7★8★9★10★
Show as table
Attack on TitanHungry Heart: Wild Striker
1★3%1%
2★0%1%
3★0%0%
4★5%3%
5★1%5%
6★2%14%
7★18%24%
8★7%28%
9★8%10%
10★55%13%

Time to watch

Episodes × episode length, openings included

Show as table
ItemRuntime
Attack on Titan10h
Hungry Heart: Wild Striker23m

Shared genres

Only Hungry Heart: Wild Striker

More comparisons

Attack on Titan vs Hungry Heart: Wild Striker FAQ

Is Attack on Titan better than Hungry Heart: Wild Striker?

By community score, Attack on Titan is ahead (8.44 vs 7.47). Both are action, so taste decides the rest.

Which is longer, Attack on Titan or Hungry Heart: Wild Striker?

Attack on Titan is longer: 10h against 23m.

Which is more popular?

Attack on Titan has more members on Kitsu (618,414 vs 2,635).

If I liked Attack on Titan, will I like Hungry Heart: Wild Striker?

Probably, if it was the action side you enjoyed.